On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 03:57:11PM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> Apologies:
>
> > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com> wrote:
> >> Monday PM end before 18:00 (GMT+1)
> >> Thursday PM.
> >> Tuesday @17:00 (GMT+1) for a short call; end before 17:30.
>
> I can't make the slot.
>
> Input: please consider interoperability of data between OWL and RDF. Option 1 is better for that than option 2 as Eric points out.
>
> This is also the least change to LC and IMHO is not a substantive change (it follows on from the current graph exchange intent) to add the text needed for SPARQL. Roughly: the scoping graph of an rdf-text aware D-entailment for BGP matching includes the RDF forms and does not include ^^rdf:text. (Non-aware entailment regimes would merely treat as a datatype form.)
does anyone oppose option 1 (plain literals are considered to satisfy entailments constrained to type rdf:text and entailments of type rdf:text are expressed as plain literals in the RDF graph)? (i'm wondering if we can work this out before we work out scheduling this phone call.)
> Andy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:alanruttenberg@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 19 May 2009 16:01
> > To: Axel Polleres
> > Cc: Seaborne, Andy; public-rdf-text@w3.org; Boris Motik; Sandro Hawke;
> > eric@w3.orf
> > Subject: Re: A summary of the proposal for resolving the issues with
> > rdf:text --> Could you please check it one more time?
> >
> > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Alan, since you were calling for the TC, is that fixed now?
> > > Otherwise, I am afraid it is not possible before Friday.
> >
> > Yes, let's have whoever can make it meet at 5:30 BST = 12:30 Boston
> > time.
> > Zakim, meet on irc #rdftext for the code. I will send a code earlier if
> > I can.
> >
> > -Alan
--
-eric
office: +1.617.258.5741 32-G528, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
mobile: +1.617.599.3509
(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.