- From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:12:30 -0400
- To: <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: <sandro@w3.org>, <public-rdf-text@w3.org>
From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:02:11 -0500 > Sandro Hawke wrote: > >> As I'm imagining it, any time anyone defines a new datatype, they are >> adding an element to the conceptual model of RDF. > > Adding a datatype does not change the conceptual model of RDF. > > Making things that were not datatyped now be datatyped, even though > their spelling in the syntax hasn't shifted, is a change. It's a > plausible change, one which I'm sure can be lived with, but the "this is > just another datatype" argument doesn't fly. But Option 5 does *not* do this! [...] > Dave peter
Received on Friday, 29 May 2009 14:14:21 UTC