Re: new version of rdf:O)-> document

> > In descriptions of the value space of plan literals 
> > in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/ language tagged values are written using 
> > "<" an ">" to group the tuple. In this document we use "(" and ")". I'd 
> > suggest using the "<" and ">" delimiters for consistency.
> 
> done. I kept '(' ')' for facet pairs, but changed to &lang; &rang; for 
> value pairs.

We had reports of problems with &lang; and &rang.  Can we just use "<"
and ">" like rdf-mt ?

> > We had discussed including a note explaining that while RDF cited RFC 
> > 3066 we interpreted that as really citing the latest version of the 
> > language tag spec, and since BCP 47 supersedes 3066, the possible values 
> > of language tags for both plain literal and rdf:PlainLiteral are the same.
> 
> Any suggestion where to put and how to word this?

Yeah, I thought about that for a bit, and couldn't figure out a good
place to put it.   :-(

    -- Sandro

Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 16:56:13 UTC