- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:23:44 -0400
- To: "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, "public-rdf-text@w3.org" <public-rdf-text@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > <rdfs:Datatype > rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#PlainLiteral"> > <rdfs:subClassOf > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal"/> > <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"/> > <rdfs:label>Plain Literal</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:comment>The class of RDF plain literal values.</rdfs:comment> > </rdfs:Datatype> > > ********************************* > > Why is the rdfs:isDefinedBy bit above insufficient to satisfy Because there is no link to the specification. If I encountered this piece of rdf, I wouldn't know where to find something a human could read to understand what it's about. Speaking as a linked data consumer. -Alan
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2009 04:27:02 UTC