RE: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org]
> Sent: 01 June 2009 21:39
> To: Seaborne, Andy
> Cc: Peter F. Patel-Schneider; public-rdf-text@w3.org
> Subject: Re: deciding on rdf:PlainLiteral this week
> 
> 
> > "The results of matching SPARQL basic graph patterns in an entailment
> > regime that understands rdf:text MUST provide variable bindings in
> > existing RDF plain literal form."
> ...
> > The first is a direct statement and, to me, clearer.  A link to
> > .../rdf-sparql-query/#sparqlBGPExtend would be good.
> 
> Okay, I added that, preceeded by a generalization which I hope is
> correct and I hopt provides enough context for most of us to know what
> it's talking about.  I trust you'll tell me if I got it wrong.  :-)
> 
> It's the new last paragraph of section 4:
> 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PlainLiteral#Syntax_for_rdf:PlainLiteral_Lit

> erals
> 
>    -- Sandro

Look good - thank you.

 Andy

Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 08:04:33 UTC