- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@amazon.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:23:21 -0700
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "public-rdf-text@w3.org" <public-rdf-text@w3.org>, "team-rif-chairs@w3.org" <team-rif-chairs@w3.org>, "team-owl-chairs@w3.org" <team-owl-chairs@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
> > > It is not a simple string > > comparison. I agree that 'text-length' may be redundant. > > Well, this function was specifically suggested to back up facets... > but if a "backup" by string-extraction and then string-length is > fine for the others, then ok Just to be clear, my comment (at top) is two things: - fn:language-range-matches is not a simple string comparison. - text-length looks redundant to me. > > > > The I18N working group intends to bring this issue to XQuery. > > However, if necessary, rdf:text should define the function, > possibly in a different namespace from fn:. > > such as? I have no idea :-). I would assume it would be a namespace rdf owns, since 'fn' belongs to the query folks. Kind Regards, Addison Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Lab126 Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture.
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 15:24:03 UTC