- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:10:16 -0400
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- cc: "public-rdf-text@w3.org" <public-rdf-text@w3.org>, RIF WG Chairs <team-rif-chairs@w3.org>, OWL WG Chairs <team-owl-chairs@w3.org>
> Boris and I had several iterations over the remaining Editorial Notes.
> We have resolved all we could, the thing remaining is that we marked both
>
> rtfn:compare
>
> and
>
> rtfn:length
>
> as AT RISK.
>
> If that is ok for LC (we think that the current definiton of the both
> functions is water-proof, but we could still remove it if there were
> serious objections) then the spec [1] is ready for last call in our opinion.
>
> Axel & Boris
>
> 1. http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec
Sounds great.
BTW, I've resolved my problem with the existing text forbidding the use
of rdf:text in RDF. (I still think the text should be changed as I
proposed, but I'm not going to fight about it any more, since I think
the language I don't like will produce less harm than a continuing to
fight about it.)
In short, speaking as a reviewer, I think this is ready for Last Call.
-- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:10:27 UTC