public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from September 2009 by subject

[Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa]

Addition to XHTML+RDFa errata document (URI mappings)

Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value

Analysis of RDFa Test Suite and XMLLiteral c14n

Bug in XHTML Vocab document

CURIE spec error reports

Errata for RDFa Section 5.5 Processing Rules

Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2

Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?]

Fixes to RDFa Test Suite

FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa

FYI: RDFa extension to Semantic Media Wiki...

Handling rel="alternate stylesheet"

head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD

HTML+RDFa (2nd draft)

HTML+RDFa (3.1 Document Conformance)

HTML5 already includes RDFa

HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD)

I think xmlns:* shows up in element.attributes in Firefox and Safari even in xhtml+xml mode

Integrated Philip Taylor's RDFa tests for XHTML, HTML4, HTML5

ISSUE-227 Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value

ISSUE-227: undeclared prefix in @datatype

ISSUE-228: itsRules textual content wrong in vocab

ISSUE-229: typo in RDFa test case 122

ISSUE-230: @lang define behavior as per XHTML 1.1.

ISSUE-231: small errata: initializing the prefix mappings

ISSUE-232: errata for 4.1 document conformance

ISSUE-233: use other URI-carrying attributes in HTML+RDFa

ISSUE-234: change default treatment of literals with markup

ISSUE-235: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes

ISSUE-236: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value

ISSUE-237: Better rdf:List support in RDFa 1.1

ISSUE-238: ERRATUM for @src in final paragraph of Syntax 3.1

ISSUE-239: PROPOSAL: Errata text to clarify CURIE-related processing requirements

ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1)

librdfa 0.16 released (and new github home)

markup in itemprop values, was: Re: microdata feedback

Meeting minutes, 2009-09-17

Minor remarks on the RDFa specs

Minor typo in test 0102 of RDFa Test Harness

Minutes of the RDFa TF, 2009-09-

Moving HTML+RDFa draft issues to HTML WG bug tracker

My first RDFa Web example (products)

Namespace declarations for 'xml' and 'xmlns'

NEW RDFa Test Suite (XHTML1.1, HTML4 and HTML5)

Parsing Curies from XSL in Firefox

Per telco on the 2009-09-17

Probable erratum - RDFA-SYNTAX (related to Issue-238: @src is a subject) = 4 changes in 2.1 + 6 + 6.3 + 6.3.2.3

probable erratum - RDFA-SYNTAX 3.10. A description of RDFa in RDF terms

PROPOSAL: Errata text to clarify CURIE-related processing requirements

PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes

PROPOSAL: What would be in an RDFa Syntax 1.0 Second Edition

Proposed Wording Change - Processing step 9

RDFa Task Force Meeting minutes for 2009-09-24

RDFa test cases

RDFa Test Suite source (via github)

Regrets for Thursday telecon

Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD

Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa)

Telecon Agenda - RDFa - Thursday 3 September, 1500 UTC

Telecon Agenda - Thursday 17 September 2009

Telecon Agenda - Thursday 24 September 2009, 1500 UTC

Telecon Agenda, Thursday 10 September 1500 UTC

Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support

The Complexity Argument

The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD)

Things to note in recent HTML+RDFa draft

xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values

XMLLiteral and stripping iquery/ifragment from <base>

XMLLiterals and c14n

XMLLiterals and c14n (was: HTML+RDFa (2nd draft))

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 20:22:44 UTC