- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:24:15 +0100
- To: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
- Cc: Othar Hansson <othar@othar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On 16 Sep 2009, at 18:19, Philip Taylor wrote: > Are you suggesting that Google should intentionally violate the > RDFa specification? Or are you suggesting the RDFa specification > should be relaxed to allow implementers freedom in handling invalid > documents? I think it must be one or the other, as long as Google > is claiming to implement RDFa. Neither. I am claiming that implementers will often want to implement a superset of RDFa. e.g. they'll want to parse RDFa plus some other HTML semantics (like <blockquote@cite>, <title>, etc). -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 17:25:01 UTC