W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:24:15 +0100
Message-Id: <623681E2-4844-4E4A-88BD-9160063E46B8@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: Othar Hansson <othar@othar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
To: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
On 16 Sep 2009, at 18:19, Philip Taylor wrote:

> Are you suggesting that Google should intentionally violate the  
> RDFa specification? Or are you suggesting the RDFa specification  
> should be relaxed to allow implementers freedom in handling invalid  
> documents? I think it must be one or the other, as long as Google  
> is claiming to implement RDFa.

Neither. I am claiming that implementers will often want to implement  
a superset of RDFa. e.g. they'll want to parse RDFa plus some other  
HTML semantics (like <blockquote@cite>, <title>, etc).

Toby A Inkster
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 17:25:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:04 UTC