Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support

On 16 Sep 2009, at 18:19, Philip Taylor wrote:

> Are you suggesting that Google should intentionally violate the  
> RDFa specification? Or are you suggesting the RDFa specification  
> should be relaxed to allow implementers freedom in handling invalid  
> documents? I think it must be one or the other, as long as Google  
> is claiming to implement RDFa.

Neither. I am claiming that implementers will often want to implement  
a superset of RDFa. e.g. they'll want to parse RDFa plus some other  
HTML semantics (like <blockquote@cite>, <title>, etc).

Toby A Inkster

Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 17:25:01 UTC