public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from September 2009 by author

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)

Ben Adida

• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 24 September 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 24 September)
• I think xmlns:* shows up in element.attributes in Firefox and Safari even in xhtml+xml mode (Thursday, 24 September)
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 17 September 2009 (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Telecon Agenda, Thursday 10 September 1500 UTC (Thursday, 10 September)
• Telecon Agenda - RDFa - Thursday 3 September, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 3 September)

Benjamin Melançon

• Re: xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values (Saturday, 5 September)
• xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values (Saturday, 5 September)

Benjamin Nowack

• markup in itemprop values, was: Re: microdata feedback (Saturday, 26 September)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)

David Peterson

• Re: HTML5 already includes RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)

David Wood

• Re: Parsing Curies from XSL in Firefox (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Parsing Curies from XSL in Firefox (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: HTML5 already includes RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

• Re: HTML+RDFa (3.1 Document Conformance) (Thursday, 17 September)
• HTML+RDFa (3.1 Document Conformance) (Wednesday, 16 September)

Evan Goer

• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) (Friday, 18 September)

Hausenblas, Michael

• Re: FYI: RDFa extension to Semantic Media Wiki... (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)

Ian Hickson

• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Saturday, 19 September)

Ivan Herman

• Re: PROPOSAL: What would be in an RDFa Syntax 1.0 Second Edition (Friday, 25 September)
• RDFa Task Force Meeting minutes for 2009-09-24 (Thursday, 24 September)
• Per telco on the 2009-09-17 (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Meeting minutes, 2009-09-17 (Friday, 18 September)
• Meeting minutes, 2009-09-17 (Thursday, 17 September)
• [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Thursday, 17 September)
• FYI: RDFa extension to Semantic Media Wiki... (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: ISSUE-236: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Minutes of the RDFa TF, 2009-09- (Friday, 11 September)
• Minutes of the RDFa TF, 2009-09- (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Things to note in recent HTML+RDFa draft (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - RDFa - Thursday 3 September, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 3 September)

Ivan Mikhailov

• Minor typo in test 0102 of RDFa Test Harness (Friday, 25 September)

James Graham

• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)

Jeni Tennison

• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes (Friday, 25 September)
• Namespace declarations for 'xml' and 'xmlns' (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: RDFa test cases (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• RDFa test cases (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Thursday, 10 September)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)

Julian Reschke

• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 16 September)

KANZAKI Masahide

• Re: Handling rel="alternate stylesheet" (Thursday, 17 September)

Keith Alexander

• Re: xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values (Saturday, 5 September)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] (Thursday, 17 September)

Laurens Holst

• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Thursday, 10 September)

Laurent.Lefort@csiro.au

• Probable erratum - RDFA-SYNTAX (related to Issue-238: @src is a subject) = 4 changes in 2.1 + 6 + 6.3 + 6.3.2.3 (Thursday, 24 September)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Bug in XHTML Vocab document (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Moving HTML+RDFa draft issues to HTML WG bug tracker (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Manu Sporny

• Integrated Philip Taylor's RDFa tests for XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 (Wednesday, 30 September)
• Regrets for Thursday telecon (Wednesday, 30 September)
• ISSUE-55: Re-enable @profile in HTML5 (draft 1) (Monday, 28 September)
• Moving HTML+RDFa draft issues to HTML WG bug tracker (Saturday, 26 September)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 24 September 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Wednesday, 23 September)
• HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Fixes to RDFa Test Suite (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: The Complexity Argument (Tuesday, 22 September)
• XMLLiteral and stripping iquery/ifragment from <base> (Monday, 21 September)
• librdfa 0.16 released (and new github home) (Monday, 21 September)
• RDFa Test Suite source (via github) (Monday, 21 September)
• NEW RDFa Test Suite (XHTML1.1, HTML4 and HTML5) (Sunday, 20 September)
• The Complexity Argument (was: Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: head/@profile, profile link relation, was: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Analysis of RDFa Test Suite and XMLLiteral c14n (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: HTML+RDFa (3.1 Document Conformance) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Addition to XHTML+RDFa errata document (URI mappings) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Minutes of the RDFa TF, 2009-09- (Thursday, 10 September)
• Things to note in recent HTML+RDFa draft (Wednesday, 9 September)
• HTML+RDFa (2nd draft) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: HTML5 already includes RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Errata for RDFa Section 5.5 Processing Rules (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)
• FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Tuesday, 1 September)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Per telco on the 2009-09-17 (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: Parsing Curies from XSL in Firefox (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: Meeting minutes, 2009-09-17 (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 17 September 2009 (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: HTML+RDFa (3.1 Document Conformance) (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Minor remarks on the RDFa specs (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)

Martin Hepp (UniBW)

• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) (Saturday, 19 September)

Masataka Yakura

• Handling rel="alternate stylesheet" (Thursday, 17 September)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Tuesday, 8 September)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] (Saturday, 5 September)

Peter Mika

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)

Philip Taylor

• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes (Thursday, 24 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: RDFa test cases (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: HTML5 RDFa Test Suite (was Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD) (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: XMLLiteral and stripping iquery/ifragment from <base> (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Analysis of RDFa Test Suite and XMLLiteral c14n (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support (Tuesday, 15 September)
• Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: XMLLiterals and c14n (Monday, 7 September)
• XMLLiterals and c14n (was: HTML+RDFa (2nd draft)) (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)

Sam Ruby

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)

Shane McCarron

• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes (Friday, 25 September)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes (Thursday, 24 September)
• PROPOSAL: Errata text to deal with the issue of predeclared 'xml' and 'xmlns' prefixes (Thursday, 24 September)
• PROPOSAL: What would be in an RDFa Syntax 1.0 Second Edition (Thursday, 24 September)
• PROPOSAL: Errata text to clarify CURIE-related processing requirements (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: RDFa test cases (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Monday, 21 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Saturday, 19 September)
• Re: My first RDFa Web example (products) (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Friday, 18 September)
• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa] (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Saturday, 12 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Thursday, 10 September)
• Errata text for RDFa Syntax section 5.5 step 2 (Thursday, 10 September)
• ISSUE-227 Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: Proposed Wording Change - Processing step 9 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Proposed Wording Change - Processing step 9 (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 3 September)

Smylers

• Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Stephane Corlosquet

• Minor remarks on the RDFa specs (Saturday, 12 September)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: I think xmlns:* shows up in element.attributes in Firefox and Safari even in xhtml+xml mode (Thursday, 24 September)
• CURIE spec error reports (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Bug in XHTML Vocab document (Wednesday, 2 September)

SWD Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-239: PROPOSAL: Errata text to clarify CURIE-related processing requirements (Thursday, 24 September)
• ISSUE-238: ERRATUM for @src in final paragraph of Syntax 3.1 (Thursday, 24 September)
• ISSUE-237: Better rdf:List support in RDFa 1.1 (Thursday, 10 September)
• ISSUE-236: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Thursday, 10 September)
• ISSUE-235: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes (Wednesday, 2 September)
• ISSUE-234: change default treatment of literals with markup (Wednesday, 2 September)
• ISSUE-233: use other URI-carrying attributes in HTML+RDFa (Wednesday, 2 September)
• ISSUE-232: errata for 4.1 document conformance (Wednesday, 2 September)
• ISSUE-231: small errata: initializing the prefix mappings (Wednesday, 2 September)
• ISSUE-230: @lang define behavior as per XHTML 1.1. (Wednesday, 2 September)
• ISSUE-228: itsRules textual content wrong in vocab (Wednesday, 2 September)
• ISSUE-227: undeclared prefix in @datatype (Wednesday, 2 September)
• ISSUE-229: typo in RDFa test case 122 (Wednesday, 2 September)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)

Toby Inkster

• probable erratum - RDFA-SYNTAX 3.10. A description of RDFa in RDF terms (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Wednesday, 23 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD (Tuesday, 22 September)
• Re: FYI: RDFa extension to Semantic Media Wiki... (Thursday, 17 September)
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Testing Google's Rich Snippets RDFa support (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] (Monday, 7 September)
• Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?] (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: xhtml markup such as <strong> and <em> in RDFa values (Saturday, 5 September)
• Re: Proposed Wording Change - Processing step 9 (Thursday, 3 September)

Tore Eriksson

• Re: Agenda Topic / Issue: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value (Friday, 11 September)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 20:22:44 UTC