Re: Request to publish HTML+RDFa (draft 3) as FPWD

On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:26, Jonas Sicking wrote:

> If I understand Henris email correctly though, he's not opposing the
> publication because of violating the "define error handling"
> principle,

Indeed, the email where I mentioned "define error handling" and the  
email where I said I don't support publication were two distinct emails.

The reason I cited for not supporting publication was the failure to  
define the processing model of RDFa in terms of the output of the  
processing models of the underlying specs. (I'm taking Shane's word  
for it that RDFa processing isn't written from the DOM or Infoset  

Henri Sivonen

Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 08:45:04 UTC