- From: David Wood <david@zepheira.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:57:08 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Sep 2, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > David Peterson wrote: >> Has there been any more thoughts / movement on this? Sounds like an >> intriguing angle.... > > Technically speaking, what Toby says is true, but only true in > specification legalese (and let's be honest, only a small fraction of > the Web community cares enough about this stuff to notice). > > We should be very clear about support of RDFa in HTML5 by publishing > an > HTML+RDFa specification. This is a better route than depending on some > language in a specification (SVG Tiny 1.2) linked to by a > specification > (HTML5) to establish that RDFa is valid in HTML5. +1 Regards, Dave
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 19:41:14 UTC