- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:28:09 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Evan Goer <goer@yahoo-inc.com>, RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Shane, On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > > Mark Birbeck wrote: > > And finally, if you also wanted to return JSON, why not still use > EARL, but use RDFj to give you 'semantic JSON'?: > > <http://code.google.com/p/ubiquity-rdfa/wiki/Rdfj> > > > Actually.... why not return what the requestor asks for in the HTTP-ACCEPT > header? I want application/xhtml+xml - ok. I want JSON - ok. I want EARL > (must be a way to indicate that) - ok. That's what I'm saying. :) EARL is an RDF format. So I'm suggesting that if it's returned as RDFa, it is directly readable, without having to process it. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 23:28:48 UTC