Re: My first RDFa Web example (products)

Hi Shane,

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Shane McCarron <> wrote:
> Mark Birbeck wrote:
> And finally, if you also wanted to return JSON, why not still use
> EARL, but use RDFj to give you 'semantic JSON'?:
>   <>
> Actually.... why not return what the requestor asks for in the HTTP-ACCEPT
> header?  I want application/xhtml+xml - ok.  I want JSON - ok.  I want EARL
> (must be a way to indicate that) - ok.

That's what I'm saying. :)

EARL is an RDF format.

So I'm suggesting that if it's returned as RDFa, it is directly
readable, without having to process it.



Mark Birbeck, webBackplane

webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
London, EC2A 4RR)

Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 23:28:48 UTC