W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2009

Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:17:33 +0200
To: "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Cc: "RDFa Developers" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uzmhfjea64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:07:17 +0200, Manu Sporny  
<msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa.html
> E-mail reviews can be sent to this mailing list, or the RDFa Task Force
> mailing list (cc'ed).

So is it the idea to leave the issue of xmlns and xmlns:<prefix> being  
different in the DOM generated from a text/html byte stream and the DOM  
generated from a text/xml byte stream unaddressed? I don't see how that  
can work without more text because xmlns and xmlns:<prefix> as generated  
 from a text/html byte stream do not carry the namespace semantics xmlns  
and xmlns:<prefix> from a text/xml bytes stream do. (They are not in a  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 09:18:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:04 UTC