- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:17:33 +0200
- To: "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
- Cc: "RDFa Developers" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:07:17 +0200, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa.html > > E-mail reviews can be sent to this mailing list, or the RDFa Task Force > mailing list (cc'ed). So is it the idea to leave the issue of xmlns and xmlns:<prefix> being different in the DOM generated from a text/html byte stream and the DOM generated from a text/xml byte stream unaddressed? I don't see how that can work without more text because xmlns and xmlns:<prefix> as generated from a text/html byte stream do not carry the namespace semantics xmlns and xmlns:<prefix> from a text/xml bytes stream do. (They are not in a namespace.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 09:18:29 UTC