- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:44:27 -0400
- To: RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
David Peterson wrote: > Has there been any more thoughts / movement on this? Sounds like an > intriguing angle.... Technically speaking, what Toby says is true, but only true in specification legalese (and let's be honest, only a small fraction of the Web community cares enough about this stuff to notice). We should be very clear about support of RDFa in HTML5 by publishing an HTML+RDFa specification. This is a better route than depending on some language in a specification (SVG Tiny 1.2) linked to by a specification (HTML5) to establish that RDFa is valid in HTML5. You could also make the technical argument that while RDFa is valid inside SVG embedded in HTML5, it isn't valid outside of SVG embedded in HTML5. So, rather than depend on language lawyering, we should make it very clear that RDFa can be embedded in HTML5: http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa.html -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Pirate Bay and Building an Equitable Culture http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/08/30/equitable-culture/
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 17:45:06 UTC