- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:53:31 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
ISSUE-233: use other URI-carrying attributes in HTML+RDFa http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/233 Raised by: Ben Adida On product: RDFa Dorian Taylor: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Aug/0005.html """ existing attributes in the markup intended to carry URIs, specifically @data in <object> and @cite in <q>, <blockquote>, <ins> and <del>. Now that I think of it, however, a similar protocol may apply to attributes like @longdesc in <img>, <frame> and <iframe> and @action in <form>. What these attributes have in common is that they follow the pattern of specifying resource objects like @href or @resource, with the exception of object/@data which I read to be equivalent to @src (or @about). While the bulk of them have additional meaning than just a URI reference (I excluded @usemap because its meaning is extremely narrow), I am optimistic that they could be used in lieu of RDFa-specific attributes without any ambiguity. The purpose of doing so (as I read the purpose of RDFa itself) use a document's existing data to express additional (not conflicting) semantics. As such, it would be totally reasonable to say: <q rel="dcterms:references" cite="#benjamin-franklin" property="rdf:value">Remember that time is money.</q> to mean: <> rdf:value "Remember that time is money."; dcterms:references <#benjamin-franklin> . ... """
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 23:53:40 UTC