- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:48:55 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On 3 Sep 2009, at 17:15, Shane McCarron wrote: > I propose that we change step 9 so that the *default* behavior is > that a "plain literal" is generated, as opposed to the default > behavior today that an "XML Literal" is generated. While I agree that this is better default behaviour, it is a big change from the current specification. Are you proposing this as an errata, or for a future version of RDFa? If the former, I think it's too big a change. If the latter, it sounds like a good idea, but it would need to be decided if processors would be expected to apply the old rule for RDFa 1.0 and the new rule for RDFa 1.1? If so, what would be the definitive way of determining which to use? Using the XHTML @version attribute and defaulting to 1.1 when it's not present makes sense for XHTML+RDFa 1.0, but perhaps not so much for other host languages such as SVG and ODF. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 16:49:38 UTC