Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >> Unfortunately, at least at the moment, there is no formal specification >> for named graphs. > > Agree. And almost everyone I know agrees as well that this should be fixed > in an updated RDF core (that is, model) in the very near future. Any plans? > Nothing specific, only my own thoughts at the moment:-(. Personally I am very wary of reopening RDF Core as a whole. Touching a stable foundation like RDF is dangerous, even if it is not perfect... My ideal would be to have the named graphs (others would call it graph literals...) taken out and concentrate on them only in terms of standardization... Ivan > Cheers, > Michael > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 07:59:52 UTC