- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:34:41 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
ISSUE-236: Clarify the meaning of "ignore" with respect to attributes that have no legal value http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/236 Raised by: Ben Adida On product: RDFa Shane raises this point: """ One issue that has come up recently is that we use inconsistent language in the RDFa Syntax Recommendation when discussing illegal values in attributes (thanks Philip!). Basically, in the current Recommendation we talk about attributes being ignored when the value(s) are illegal. I believe that when we say this (and we say it in a couple of different ways), we ALWAYS mean: "When an attribute has no legal values, a conforming RDFa Processor MUST act as if the attribute were not present at all. The processor MUST NOT act as if the attribute were present, but with the empty string as its value." """ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Sep/0085.html
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 05:35:01 UTC