Re: Feature request for RDFa 1.1 [Fwd: rdf:Lists in RDFa?]

Yes, something like that. One could say

<blabla role="Collection">


with the immediate descendents of <blabla> playing the same role as the
<li>-s in the case of <ul>/<ol>. Or use the @role for those elements as
well to make things explicit.


Toby Inkster wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2009, at 10:00, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> This approach is not optimal either, because it is really bound to the
>> specifics of HTML.
> Maybe @role could help out here.
> <ul> and <ol> trigger the rdf:List behaviour, but if you want to use a
> different HTML element (e.g. <div>), or are using a markup language
> other than HTML, then you can force rdf:List behaviour via @role.
> <list xmlns:xhv=""
>       about="#mylist"
>       role="xhv:list">
> ...
> </list>


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key:

Received on Monday, 7 September 2009 10:35:01 UTC