Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa

On Sep 2, 2009, at 00:07, Manu Sporny wrote:


Section 2 doesn't say if it's normative or informative. It looks  

In section 4.1, I suggest referring to the HTML5 rules for determining  
the language of a node.

The last paragraph of 4.1 confuses DOCTYPE and MIME type.

Section 4.2 talks about well-formed XML, but XMLLiterals are generally  
not well-formed (i.e. they aren't guaranteed to have a single root).

Section 4.2 should probably require the Coercion to Infoset rules be  
applied prior to applying the serialization algorithm.

Please clarify what 4.3 intends to say in terms of DOM Level 2 or the  

Please clarify what 5.2 means for processors that expose the content  
of a text/html document using a non-DOM API view to the Infoset (e.g.  

Henri Sivonen

Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 07:24:41 UTC