W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2009

Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:37:44 +0100
Message-Id: <951D6FD0-23C9-4D54-B10C-5E80691ABADC@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
To: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
On 5 Sep 2009, at 13:00, Philip Taylor wrote:

> In most cases the CURIE syntax restriction is sufficient - you  
> can't have rel="0:test" (it will just be ignored) so it doesn't  
> really matter how xmlns:0="..." was processed. But you can write  
> rel=":test", so it matters how xmlns:="..." interacts with that.

Actually rel=":test" in XHTML+RDFa (and presumably in Manu's HTML  
draft) is defined to always map exactly to:


and not be dependent on CURIE prefix mapping at all.

Toby A Inkster
Received on Saturday, 5 September 2009 12:38:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:04 UTC