- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:01:22 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-rdfa@w3.org
I agree that this is great news. However, when I went and LOOKED at the page we use in our examples, http://dbpedia.org/page/Albert_Einstein , I see that it is invalid in a number of respects. It is unfortunate that dbpedia is at the mercy of the resources they troll. The markup ends up being hard to manage, I suspect. I was forced to put my parser into "html" mode to get it to swallow that page: http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/rdfa/extract_rdfa.pl?format=n3&type=html&uri=http://dbpedia.org/page/Albert_Einstein Ivan Herman wrote: > FYI > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa > Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:32:01 +0000 > Resent-From: public-lod@w3.org > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:31:19 -0400 > From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> > To: public-lod@w3.org > CC: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, > "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" > <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net> > References: > <f914914c0909160749s4adaa3b5q517b418a1b0a9619@mail.gmail.com> > <4AB1024E.4000309@openlinksw.com> > > All, > > Quick FYI. > > All DBpedia pages now include RDFa. Thus, re. the DBpedia Linked Data > Space, you now have HTML+RDFa as a structured metadata representation > alternative to N3, Turtle, RDF/XML, and RDF/JSON (*new*). > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 15:02:12 UTC