meeting record: 2007-06-28 RDFa Task Force
[RDFa TC] RDFa Test Runner update
the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere
[RDFa TC] Review and Approval of XHTML Test Case partition
RDFa at Kendra initiative
Telecon Agenda - Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
[RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
[RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification
[RDFa] Proposed resolutions to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4
Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand, PROPOSAL for RESOLUTION
request for profile URI for RDFa
An Update on RDFa Schedule and Docs
regrets for this week
News Architecture 1.0 officially adopted by the IPTC
RDF features covered by RDFa
meeting record: 2007-06-21 RDFa Telecon
[Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src
- Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src
Agenda Correction
Telecon Agenda - Thursday, 21 June 2007, 1500 UTC
Regrets for this week
[ANN] RDFa On Rails 0.0.8
[RDFa] Meeting record: 2007-06-14 RDF-in-XHTML telecon
[RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers
[RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document
[RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification
ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals
- Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals
- Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals
- Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals
- Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals
- Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals
[RDFa] ISSUE-5
[RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand
Literals and turning off datatype/language
at risk/regrets for 14 June
LeeF's comments (again)
RDFa Telecon - Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
Validation Update: success!
- RE: Validation Update: success!
- Re: Validation Update: success!
- Re: Validation Update: success!
Re: Blank nodes & classes
- Re: Blank nodes & classes
- Re: Blank nodes & classes
- Re: Blank nodes & classes
- Re: Blank nodes & classes