W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2007

RE: Validation Update: success!

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:26:54 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201168C2E@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Well, I can kind of confirm this. I have a HTML 4.01
test file at [1] and ran it through the new validator [2]
(the current version treats the MIME type as an error ...).

Still I don't know what the heck I did wrong with
the HTML file (entity declaration) ... if you view the
test file [1] in a browser, you'll see what I mean ;)



 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ben Adida
>Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 7:09 PM
>To: RDFa
>Subject: Validation Update: success!
>Hi folks,
>I just noticed that the W3C validator team has added XHTML+RDFa support
>and no longer throws errors on xmlns:* attributes in its beta-version
>validator [1]. I'm guessing both of these things are due in large part
>to Shane, though he may be too humble and busy to admit it :)
>The validator is at:
>and you can specifically check my FOAF card:
>That's right, it validates, nothing weird, just XHTML+RDFa and 
>the right
>DTD declaration.
>Though I take no credit for this, I note that my action to check on
>XML-DTD validation is likely DONE, or at least WITHDRAWN!
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2007Jun/0002.html
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 08:24:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:50 UTC