- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:26:54 +0200
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Ben, Well, I can kind of confirm this. I have a HTML 4.01 test file at [1] and ran it through the new validator [2] (the current version treats the MIME type as an error ...). Still I don't know what the heck I did wrong with the HTML file (entity declaration) ... if you view the test file [1] in a browser, you'll see what I mean ;) Cheers, Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/validation_test.h tml [2] http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2006%2F 07%2FSWD%2FRDFa%2Ftestsuite%2Ftestcases%2Fvalidation_test.html&charset=% 28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0 ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ben Adida >Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 7:09 PM >To: RDFa >Subject: Validation Update: success! > > > >Hi folks, > >I just noticed that the W3C validator team has added XHTML+RDFa support >and no longer throws errors on xmlns:* attributes in its beta-version >validator [1]. I'm guessing both of these things are due in large part >to Shane, though he may be too humble and busy to admit it :) > >The validator is at: >http://validator-test.w3.org > >and you can specifically check my FOAF card: >http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fben.adida.n et%2Fcard.xhtml&charset=%28detect+automatically%29>&doctype=Inline&group =0 > >That's right, it validates, nothing weird, just XHTML+RDFa and >the right >DTD declaration. > >Though I take no credit for this, I note that my action to check on >XML-DTD validation is likely DONE, or at least WITHDRAWN! > >-Ben > >[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2007Jun/0002.html > >
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 08:24:04 UTC