- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:23:20 +0200
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
>ISSUE-5 is on our list: >http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/5 > >This is about whether @REL/@REV/@PROPERTY should be CURIE only (QNames, >most of the time), or CURIE/URI, like about. In other words, should we >write: > ><span property="dc:title">RDFa Specification</span> > >or > ><span property="[dc:title]">RDFa Specification</span> > > >Given that we have been writing all specs and implementations using the >assumption that these are *only* CURIEs (no square brackets), I propose >that we make these attributes CURIE only. +1 for CURIE only Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 14:20:38 UTC