Re: Validation Update: success!

And to top it all off, the W3C communications team has put together
valid XHTML+RDFa logos (with thanks to Alex Roberts from Creative
Commons who did the first pass):

http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml-rdfa.png
http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml-rdfa.gif

These are being integrated into the beta version of the validator.

-Ben

Cédric Mesnage wrote:
> This is great, I programmed against it yesterday and now RDFa On Rails
> generates RDFa which validates.
> 
> My homepage is valid XHTML+RDFa, generated with RDFa On Rails! Go check it:
> 
> http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcedricmesnage.org%2Findex.xhtml
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> ---
> Cédric Mesnage
> PhD Student
> cedric.mesnage@lu.unisi.ch <mailto:cedric.mesnage@lu.unisi.ch>
> http://www.cedricmesnage.org
> http://blog.cedricmesnage.org/
> 
> 
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Ben Adida wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I just noticed that the W3C validator team has added XHTML+RDFa support
>> and no longer throws errors on xmlns:* attributes in its beta-version
>> validator [1]. I'm guessing both of these things are due in large part
>> to Shane, though he may be too humble and busy to admit it :)
>>
>> The validator is at:
>> http://validator-test.w3.org
>>
>> and you can specifically check my FOAF card:
>> http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fben.adida.net%2Fcard.xhtml&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
>> <http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fben.adida.net%2Fcard.xhtml&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0>
>>
>> That's right, it validates, nothing weird, just XHTML+RDFa and the right
>> DTD declaration.
>>
>> Though I take no credit for this, I note that my action to check on
>> XML-DTD validation is likely DONE, or at least WITHDRAWN!
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2007Jun/0002.html
>>
>

Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 15:52:05 UTC