- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:24:34 -0700
- To: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi all, Our telecon is this Thursday, June 14th, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston, which is in about 21 hours. I'll get the agenda out more promptly as I get more settled in! -Ben ========== Thursday, June 14th, 2007. 1500 UTC, W3C Zakim bridge tel:+1.617.761.6200 conference code RDFA irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#rdfa Duration: 60 minutes ========== Agenda: 1) Action Item Review http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007May/0073 2) Issues Review - ISSUE-25: Default Datatype for Literals. I believe we resolved this, but let's make it official. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/25 - ISSUE-2: custom shorthand attributes We haven't discussed this in a while, and I think we should vote NO on this, or at least postpone it to a later version of RDFa. We have to start closing these issues :) - ISSUE-5: rel/rev/property CURIE only, or CURIE/URI? We've all been working on the assumption that it's CURIE only, and I'd like to formalize this assumption and move on. - ISSUE-28: following one's nose to the RDFa specification. We should discuss this. I suspect that, with the latest validation story, we have a good solution, though I'm not opposed to saying that a profile is "good practice" if you know ahead of time that your page will have RDFa. - ISSUE-29: what is the MIME type for an RDFa document? I think we informally agreed that it is "whatever the host language's mime type is." Let's formalize this. 3) Schedule and Document Status (I'm still updating the schedule document, but we'll discuss this on the call.) 4) The @RESOURCE and @HREF situation We need to start coming to a conclusion on this, so let's lay out the options and discuss.
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 17:24:38 UTC