- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:03:03 -0500
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Cc: Christoph <ch95@rz.uni-freiburg.de>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, mark.birbeck@x-port.net
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:29 +0200, Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > > Christoph, > > >One last thing, this whole topic is different to the question of > >validity; we're working on DTDs and schemas to validate HTML+RDFa and > >XHTML+RDFa so whatever mark-up structure we use, we can validate it. > > You may also want to check [1], which covers this topic as well. > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaInHTML It says there to use a custom DTD http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/html401-rdfa-1.dtd with HTML 4.01 But the HTML 4.01 spec doesn't allow custom DTDs: "HTML 4.01 specifies three DTDs, so authors must include one of the following document type declarations in their documents." -- http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#version-info This claim that RDFa can be used in HTML 4.01 also shows up in the test draft. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 15:07:58 UTC