- From: Cédric Mesnage <cedric.mesnage@lu.unisi.ch>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:58:08 +0200
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <9A9FC218-C715-4C3A-8D22-965D950FE377@lu.unisi.ch>
This is great, I programmed against it yesterday and now RDFa On Rails generates RDFa which validates. My homepage is valid XHTML+RDFa, generated with RDFa On Rails! Go check it: http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcedricmesnage.org% 2Findex.xhtml Cheers! --- Cédric Mesnage PhD Student cedric.mesnage@lu.unisi.ch http://www.cedricmesnage.org http://blog.cedricmesnage.org/ On Jun 13, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Ben Adida wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > I just noticed that the W3C validator team has added XHTML+RDFa > support > and no longer throws errors on xmlns:* attributes in its beta-version > validator [1]. I'm guessing both of these things are due in large part > to Shane, though he may be too humble and busy to admit it :) > > The validator is at: > http://validator-test.w3.org > > and you can specifically check my FOAF card: > http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fben.adida.net% > 2Fcard.xhtml&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0 > > That's right, it validates, nothing weird, just XHTML+RDFa and the > right > DTD declaration. > > Though I take no credit for this, I note that my action to check on > XML-DTD validation is likely DONE, or at least WITHDRAWN! > > -Ben > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2007Jun/ > 0002.html >
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 10:56:12 UTC