FRBR and information resource provenance
proposal: drop 'formal model' terminology
Meeting minutes 2011-09-29
PROV-ONT: turtle for ontology examples
Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- RE: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document
- ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document)
- Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document)
- Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document)
- Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document
- Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document
mercurial changes
PROV-ISSUE-107 (interoperability-rdf-serialization): is example provenance serialization in RDF inter-operable? [Formal Model]
PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model]
PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model]
PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
PROV-ISSUE-103 (qualifiers-and-roles): Qualifiers and roles in the ontology [Formal Model]
PROV-WG: Minutes of Sept 22 2011
PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model]
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 29 Sep 2011
Re: Liaison to W3C Provenance Working Group
PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model]
Finalizing Connection Task Force Informal Report...Due September 29
PROV-ISSUE-100 (Entity definition): Section 5.2.1 Entity [Conceptual Model]
Comments of PROV-DM document (Section 2.1 and 3)
Comments on the current data model
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model]
Re: ISSUE-23: Create definition of involve to replace Use
Re: PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model]
links across specs
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-81 (identity-clash-scope): In a given scope, are entities with same identifier but different attributes legal? [Conceptual Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of
Re: PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model]
- RE: RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-69 (Process Execution): Process execution occurs over a "continuous time interval"? [Conceptual Model]
Revised model document
RDF named graph use case and requirement
- Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement
- Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement
PROV-WG Minutes 15 September 2011
Unifying RDF Provenance Use Case: Trust
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 Sep 2011
scribe for this week?
new release of PROV-DM document
PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model]
PROV-ISSUE-98: add "generated" to conceptual and OWL models [Formal Model]
Connection Informal Report and Connection Task Force Monday meeting.
PROV-ISSUE-97 (TLebo): define prov:wasComplementOf [Formal Model]
Issue 89 - why?
New mailing list: RDF/Prov joint task force
PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model]
named graphs materials
PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model]
Reviewing outstanding issues on PAQ document.
Re: PROV-ISSUE-73: Use "anchor" context URI instead of introducing a "target" relationship in HTTP [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model]
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 15 Sep 2011
Re: Draft agenda 15 Sep tccordination telecon
Re: Provenance requirements for RDF named graphs
PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model]
Re: formal semantics strawman
Meeting minutes 2011-09-08
proposed name for standard is PROV (deadline September 14th midnight GMT)
Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman
- Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman
- Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman
Primer skeleton
News ontology
Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model]
PROV-ISSUE-93: wasDerivedFrom is an owl sub-propety of dependedOn [Formal Model]
Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance)
- Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance)
- Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance)
- Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance)
Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance
- Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance
- Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance
- Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance
- Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance
RDFWG+ProvWG Joint Meeting about "Graphs" (eg Named Graphs)
PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model]
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 08 Sep 2011
provenance, authorization, audit trails and licensing
- Re: provenance, authorization, audit trails and licensing
- Re: provenance, authorization, audit trails and licensing
PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-84 (namespace-for-properties): What should namespace for properties be? [Formal Model]
PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
FW: provenance questionnaire, v2
Primer proposal
Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model]
Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"?
- RE: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"?
- Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"?
- Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"?
- Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"?
Re: PROV-ISSUE-31 (standard-names): what names do we use to refer to the language, ontology, and access/query methods [Conceptual Model]
name straw poll
Meeting minutes 2011-09-01
Definition of Entity
PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model]
PROV-ISSUE-88 (Provenance-container): Provenance container seems an unnecessary concept
PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model]
PROV-ISSUE-86 (High-level-overview): The conceptual model needs a high level overview [Conceptual Model]
PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model]