- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 10:24:12 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 16:49, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > Yes, but not that many. Perhaps I should try to express that > provenance manually using the syntax used in the model document. Updated http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TavernaProvenance using ontology in past tense. Abstract provenance syntax: see https://github.com/stain/taverna-prov/blob/master/example/zip-prov-abstract.txt (transcribed from the RDF and given easier identifiers) and https://github.com/stain/taverna-prov/blob/master/example/zip-prov-abstract-ideal.txt (filled in additional info) This last representation shows me that the abstract model can express pretty much all the information we have in Taverna's provenance (except for details on collections, iterations, errors, runtime environment and and the workflow definition itself) - so that is very promising. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 09:25:00 UTC