Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance

Hi Stian,
This is cool!  Have you identified issues with the conceptual model too?
Luc

On 09/08/2011 03:40 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 08:29, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>    
>> Looks good! I'll come with some more detailed comments and write-up of
>> my thoughts as I've quickly done a plugin for exporting Taverna
>> provenance according to the ontology.
>>      
> Please have a look at:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TavernaProvenance
>
> showing a *real* example of using the ontology from within our Taverna
> workflow system. It is looking quite promising, but I also found a few
> issues, which is understandable as it's early days still.
>
>
>    
>> Should I do suggested changes as a feature branch.. or how are we
>> using the mercurial repository?
>>      
> I've started a little branch locally and changed rdfs:comment ->
> rdfs:label and updated the properties according to our decisions on
> tense and direction. I have however not updated the textual document.
> Would you like me to proceed with this, or have you already started? I
> guess I should join the Ontology call on Mondays. Could you help me
> with the call details?
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 14:51:53 UTC