- From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:35:55 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I could imagine many users might specialise the "used" property to express more precisely how an entity was used, e.g. taverna:2613 a prov:ProcessExecution; mywf:usedValue taverna:676. mywf:usedValue rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used. Does this make sense? Assuming we have no power to stop this being done, does it have a different meaning to ascribing a role using the Role class? Thanks, Simon On 9 September 2011 12:41, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:35, Stian Soiland-Reyes > <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > > >> <http://ns.taverna.org.uk/2011/run/2613aab1-dfe9-4a17-a4be-7589f5d388d6/> >> a prov:ProcessExecution; >> prov:used [ >> rdf:type >> <http://ns.taverna.org.uk/2010/workflow/ea4168eb-67ea-440f-ab73-818da5efc998/processor/String_constant/out/value> >> prov:assumedBy >> <http://ns.taverna.org.uk/2011/data/2613aab1-dfe9-4a17-a4be-7589f5d388d6/ref/153277f1-5e4f-43fc-968d-ab3a8b038676> >> ; > > Note that I messed up the direction here - if something was 'used' > then the role should of course be an *input* port. Just imagine > s/Output/Input/g for the whole thing as it is not possible to edit an > email once it's sent. :-) > > > (I wanted to do the discussion on 'used' rather than 'generated' - as > use can naturally occur in several roles in several process execution > - and indeed in several roles for the same execution) > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > > -- Dr Simon Miles Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 14:36:25 UTC