Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance

really cool!

that addresses one of my suggestions, that the model should be shown to work on "popular" cases of workflow provenance.
I'm happy to see the ProvenanceAccess API in action!

Stian and I are using this as an opportunity to discuss how to properly add collection relations to the model. So that's a very 
useful exercise


On 9/8/11 3:40 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 08:29, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> <>  wrote:
>> Looks good! I'll come with some more detailed comments and write-up of
>> my thoughts as I've quickly done a plugin for exporting Taverna
>> provenance according to the ontology.
> Please have a look at:
> showing a *real* example of using the ontology from within our Taverna
> workflow system. It is looking quite promising, but I also found a few
> issues, which is understandable as it's early days still.
>> Should I do suggested changes as a feature branch.. or how are we
>> using the mercurial repository?
> I've started a little branch locally and changed rdfs:comment ->
> rdfs:label and updated the properties according to our decisions on
> tense and direction. I have however not updated the textual document.
> Would you like me to proceed with this, or have you already started? I
> guess I should join the Ontology call on Mondays. Could you help me
> with the call details?

-----------  ~oo~  --------------
Paolo Missier -,
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK

Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 16:55:02 UTC