Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance

Hi Stian,
Thanks for reviewing the ontology and exporting Taverna provenance using
this ontology! Have you seen the need to create some additional (sub)
classes, since Taverna's provenance description is much more detailed?

> I've started a little branch locally and changed rdfs:comment
-> rdfs:label and updated the properties according to our > decisions
on tense and direction.
Have you pushed the changes to mercurial - I checked the owl file and it
uses rdfs:label (except for "Role").

Also, I just updated the labels by replacing Bobs with entities and
rdfs:label for "Role". Please add your changes to this version and add to
the repository.

>  I have however not updated the textual document. Would you like me to
proceed with this, or have you already >started?
I have made some changes locally and will push it later - if you can add
(push) your changes to mercurial I will update my local version.

I have added your skype id to the ontology call.

Thanks again!

Best,
Satya


On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 08:29, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > Looks good! I'll come with some more detailed comments and write-up of
> > my thoughts as I've quickly done a plugin for exporting Taverna
> > provenance according to the ontology.
>
> Please have a look at:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TavernaProvenance
>
> showing a *real* example of using the ontology from within our Taverna
> workflow system. It is looking quite promising, but I also found a few
> issues, which is understandable as it's early days still.
>
>
> > Should I do suggested changes as a feature branch.. or how are we
> > using the mercurial repository?
>
> I've started a little branch locally and changed rdfs:comment ->
> rdfs:label and updated the properties according to our decisions on
> tense and direction. I have however not updated the textual document.
> Would you like me to proceed with this, or have you already started? I
> guess I should join the Ontology call on Mondays. Could you help me
> with the call details?
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
>