Or Provenance Assertion STandard for PAST? From: public-prov-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim McCusker Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 12:02 PM To: Stian Soiland-Reyes Cc: Luc Moreau; Provenance Working Group WG Subject: Re: name straw poll On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk<mailto:soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>> wrote: So how about we make these 3 the only contenders, and see what negative "blockers" we would have if any, before doing a formal vote? Here are mine: PIF - reminds me of that Windows thing for running DOS programs. (not blocker!) PIL - not just a language! PAST - Good, except the backronym - SchemaTa? "Ta" is something we casually say for "Thanks" here in UK. Also, too many possible types of schematas involved, RDFS, OWL, XSD? The model? SQL? I can picture "Are you using the PAST schema?" confusions. How about Provenance Assertion STructure or Provenance Assertion SysTem? Jim -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu<mailto:james.mccusker@yale.edu> | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu<mailto:mccusj@cs.rpi.edu> http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:42:26 UTC