- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:53:18 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I don't feel strongly enough about this to raise a formal objection, but I note it is not one of the options for which we were polled, and it has a kind of "awkward" feel to me. But if other folks are happy with this, don't waste cycles by replying or trying to convince me - I'll happily let it stand. #g -- On 09/09/2011 16:50, Luc Moreau wrote: > > Hi all, > > At the teleconference yesterday, the call participants voted for > PROV as the name of the standard. > > *If you have any formal objection*, can you please raise it > by email before September 14th (midnight GMT). > > The intent is to have the name of the standard formally recorded at the > teleconference on 2011-09-15. > > Best regards, > > Luc > > PS. It is proposed that we would use the name along the lines of: > - The PROV Data Model > - The PROV Ontology > - prov:Entity for prefix > - TR URLs likely to include prov > >
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 16:54:38 UTC