- From: Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:16:31 -0600
- To: "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Stian - I just read the following article today. http://geopw.whu.edu.cn/docs/files/provenanceservice.pdf You might find the geospatial workflow requirements, use case, and technology solution approach interesting. Regards Carl Reed OGC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> To: "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Cc: <public-prov-wg@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 9:49 AM Subject: Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 15:51, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > This is cool! Have you identified issues with the conceptual model too? Yes, but not that many. Perhaps I should try to express that provenance manually using the syntax used in the model document. I'll formalise my (potential) issues and put them in the tracker so we can discuss them one by one. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 01:17:04 UTC