- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:48:42 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Stian > PAST - Good, except the backronym - SchemaTa? "Ta" is something we > casually say for "Thanks" here in UK. Also, too many possible types of > schematas involved, RDFS, OWL, XSD? The model? SQL? I can picture "Are > you using the PAST schema?" confusions. generally I am not obsessed with acronyms. PAST may be a good mnemonic regardless. But "schemata" is misleading. I think it sends too limited a message. oh btw: not "schematas", please!! it reminds me of "paninis" and I convulse in horror :-) it's either schemas (US) or schemata (Greece, UK and other civilised regions :-)) -Paolo
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 07:49:08 UTC