On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes < soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > I like this suggestion, except that we now have to talk about the plan > as an entity.. my initial thought was that the recipe-link goes "out > there in the world" - so in my example it goes directly to the > wf:ProcessDefinitions - I'm not sure if it would be OK or not for > those to also become entities and used.. in many ways it's right like > you say. And I've mentioned before how this avoids having to decide if > something is program or data. > If it's only ever a plan, I would imagine that using its URI directly (and calling it a Plan in the provenance) would suffice without having to create a new URI. It would be helpful to be able to have direct references of Entities like that for folks who don't feel they need the indirection of ivp/complement/whateverOf. Jim -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 16:29:24 UTC