public-prov-wg@w3.org from September 2011 by date

Friday, 30 September 2011

• Re: mercurial changes Timothy Lebo
• FRBR and information resource provenance Jim McCusker
• RE: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document Myers, Jim
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) Satya Sahoo
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) Satya Sahoo
• Re: proposal: drop 'formal model' terminology Stian Soiland-Reyes
• proposal: drop 'formal model' terminology Luc Moreau
• Meeting minutes 2011-09-29 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-107 (interoperability-rdf-serialization): is example provenance serialization in RDF inter-operable? [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: mercurial changes Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ONT: turtle for ontology examples Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document Luc Moreau
• PROV-ONT: turtle for ontology examples Paul Groth
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document Paul Groth

Thursday, 29 September 2011

• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document Graham Klyne
• RE: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document Myers, Jim
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• RE: RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document Graham Klyne
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Cresswell, Stephen
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document Luc Moreau
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document James Cheney
• Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document Graham Klyne
• Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document Graham Klyne
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) Luc Moreau
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) Paolo Missier
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) Luc Moreau
• Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document James Cheney
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) Paolo Missier
• ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) Luc Moreau
• Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document Satya Sahoo

Wednesday, 28 September 2011

• mercurial changes Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-107 (interoperability-rdf-serialization): is example provenance serialization in RDF inter-operable? [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model] Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] Myers, Jim
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] Jim McCusker
• PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] Jim McCusker
• PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• PROV-ISSUE-103 (qualifiers-and-roles): Qualifiers and roles in the ontology [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-WG: Minutes of Sept 22 2011 Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] Paolo Missier
• PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 27 September 2011

• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 29 Sep 2011 Luc Moreau
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Cresswell, Stephen
• Re: Liaison to W3C Provenance Working Group Kai Eckert

Monday, 26 September 2011

• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: Finalizing Connection Task Force Informal Report...Due September 29 runnegar@isoc.org
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• Finalizing Connection Task Force Informal Report...Due September 29 ericphb@gmail.com
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Graham Klyne
• RE: formal semantics strawman Myers, Jim
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: formal semantics strawman Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
• PROV-ISSUE-100 (Entity definition): Section 5.2.1 Entity [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 25 September 2011

• Comments of PROV-DM document (Section 2.1 and 3) Satya Sahoo
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Cresswell, Stephen

Saturday, 24 September 2011

• Comments on the current data model Simon Miles
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim

Friday, 23 September 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• Re: formal semantics strawman James Cheney
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Sandro Hawke
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Cresswell, Stephen
• Re: links across specs James Cheney
• Re: links across specs Luc Moreau
• Re: new release of PROV-DM document Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: links across specs James Cheney
• Re: ISSUE-23: Create definition of involve to replace Use Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• links across specs Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-81 (identity-clash-scope): In a given scope, are entities with same identifier but different attributes legal? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-86 (High-level-overview): The conceptual model needs a high level overview [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-69 (Process Execution): Process execution occurs over a "continuous time interval"? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Luc Moreau

Thursday, 22 September 2011

• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Graham Klyne

Friday, 23 September 2011

• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Graham Klyne

Thursday, 22 September 2011

• Re: Connection Informal Report and Connection Task Force Monday meeting. Yolanda Gil
• RE: Unifying RDF Provenance Use Case: Trust Myers, Jim
• Revised model document Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] Paolo Missier
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Satya Sahoo
• Re: new release of PROV-DM document Paolo Missier
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Luc Moreau
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Luc Moreau
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: new release of PROV-DM document Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] Daniel Garijo
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 Sep 2011 (and RDF named graph reqs) Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue 89 - why? Graham Klyne
• RDF named graph use case and requirement Graham Klyne
• Re: formal semantics strawman Stian Soiland-Reyes
• PROV-WG Minutes 15 September 2011 Paul Groth
• RE: formal semantics strawman Myers, Jim
• Re: formal semantics strawman Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Unifying RDF Provenance Use Case: Trust Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 20 September 2011

• Re: formal semantics strawman James Cheney
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 Sep 2011 Paul Groth
• scribe for this week? Paul Groth

Monday, 19 September 2011

• Re: Issue 89 - why? Graham Klyne
• new release of PROV-DM document Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-98: add "generated" to conceptual and OWL models [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Issue 89 - why? Luc Moreau
• Re: Issue 89 - why? Luc Moreau
• RE: Issue 89 - why? Myers, Jim
• Re: Issue 89 - why? Satya Sahoo

Sunday, 18 September 2011

• Re: Issue 89 - why? Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue 89 - why? Satya Sahoo
• Re: Issue 89 - why? Graham Klyne
• Connection Informal Report and Connection Task Force Monday meeting. Eric Stephan

Saturday, 17 September 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
• RE: Issue 89 - why? Myers, Jim
• PROV-ISSUE-97 (TLebo): define prov:wasComplementOf [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Issue 89 - why? Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Roles Graham Klyne
• Issue 89 - why? Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Friday, 16 September 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Roles Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• RE: Roles Myers, Jim
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Roles Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Roles Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: Roles Khalid Belhajjame

Thursday, 15 September 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo
• Re: Roles Paolo Missier
• New mailing list: RDF/Prov joint task force Sandro Hawke
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
• Re: Roles Luc Moreau
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• RE: formal semantics strawman Myers, Jim
• Re: Roles Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
• named graphs materials Timothy Lebo
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: formal semantics strawman James Cheney
• RE: formal semantics strawman Myers, Jim
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• Reviewing outstanding issues on PAQ document. Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-73: Use "anchor" context URI instead of introducing a "target" relationship in HTTP [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Simon Miles
• Re: formal semantics strawman Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 14 September 2011

• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 15 Sep 2011 Graham Klyne
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 15 Sep 2011 Luc Moreau
• Re: Draft agenda 15 Sep tccordination telecon Luc Moreau
• Re: Provenance requirements for RDF named graphs Yolanda Gil

Sunday, 11 September 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame

Saturday, 10 September 2011

• PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: formal semantics strawman Myers, Jim
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Graham Klyne

Friday, 9 September 2011

• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Daniel Garijo
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Graham Klyne
• Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman Graham Klyne
• Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman Graham Klyne
• Re: proposed name for standard is PROV (deadline September 14th midnight GMT) Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Meeting minutes 2011-09-08 Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• proposed name for standard is PROV (deadline September 14th midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Luc Moreau
• Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman James Cheney
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Simon Miles
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Primer skeleton Simon Miles
• News ontology Simon Miles
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• PROV-ISSUE-93: wasDerivedFrom is an owl sub-propety of dependedOn [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: provenance, authorization, audit trails and licensing Graham Klyne
• Apologies (was: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 08 Sep 2011) Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Paolo Missier
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Carl Reed

Thursday, 8 September 2011

• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Paolo Missier
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Satya Sahoo
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Timothy Lebo
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Luc Moreau
• Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: name straw poll Stian Soiland-Reyes

Wednesday, 7 September 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] Satya Sahoo
• RDFWG+ProvWG Joint Meeting about "Graphs" (eg Named Graphs) Sandro Hawke
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 08 Sep 2011 Daniel Garijo
• PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 08 Sep 2011 Luc Moreau
• Re: name straw poll Paolo Missier

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

• Re: name straw poll Jim McCusker
• RE: name straw poll Myers, Jim
• Re: provenance, authorization, audit trails and licensing Stephan Zednik
• provenance, authorization, audit trails and licensing Deus, Helena
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Satya Sahoo
• Re: name straw poll Jim McCusker
• FW: provenance questionnaire, v2 Deus, Helena
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim
• RE: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Myers, Jim
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
• Re: FW: provenance questionnaire, v2 Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-84 (namespace-for-properties): What should namespace for properties be? [Formal Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: name straw poll Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• FW: provenance questionnaire, v2 Deus, Helena
• Re: Primer proposal Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne

Monday, 5 September 2011

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
• Primer proposal Simon Miles
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Luc Moreau
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Graham Klyne
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Luc Moreau
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Luc Moreau

Saturday, 3 September 2011

• RE: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Myers, Jim
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Simon Miles
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles
• RE: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Myers, Jim
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Simon Miles
• RE: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Myers, Jim
• Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? Graham Klyne

Friday, 2 September 2011

• Re: Definition of Entity Graham Klyne
• Re: Definition of Entity Luc Moreau
• Re: Definition of Entity Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• RE: Definition of Entity Myers, Jim
• Re: Definition of Entity Luc Moreau
• Re: Definition of Entity Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-31 (standard-names): what names do we use to refer to the language, ontology, and access/query methods [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• name straw poll Luc Moreau
• Meeting minutes 2011-09-01 Luc Moreau
• Re: Definition of Entity Luc Moreau
• Definition of Entity Graham Klyne
• PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 1 September 2011

• PROV-ISSUE-88 (Provenance-container): Provenance container seems an unnecessary concept Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-86 (High-level-overview): The conceptual model needs a high level overview [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• email to send second questionnaire Deus, Helena
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-76 (xml-examples): Shouldn't we have proper examples in XML and not RDF/XML [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-75 (provenance-service-and-provenance-uri): What do we do when we get both provenance service and provenance-uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
• Re: views, complements and invariants Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-79 (provenance-uri-contract): what is the contract associated with provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2011 21:03:08 UTC