- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:04:10 +0100
- To: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Luc, I'm picking up a small matter here to illustrate things I've said previously. I notice in ISSUE 89 you say: "The conceptual model defines an entity in terms of an identifier and a list of attribute-value pairs. It is indeed crucial for the asserter to identify the attributes that have been frozen in a given entity." But when I look at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#concept-Entity, this is not what I see. What I do see is a description of an "Entity assertion" that contains a list of attribute pairs, which to my reading is not the same thing at all. This is a part of the problem I have when I say the model document is difficult to understand. (I'm not raising this as an issue, as I've already raised a different issue to say I think that an Entity doesn't need to be so complicated.) #g
Received on Friday, 2 September 2011 11:11:24 UTC