- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:26:00 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:29, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > 1. Given this confusion, Paul and I would like to propose that we drop the > terminology 'Formal Model'. > Can you express your support or disagreement for this proposal? +1 (specially as currently the conceptual model seems like the most formal model!) > 2. Assuming we adopt the proposal, what should the document title become, we > leave it to authors/editors to decide. > To get the ball rolling: 'semantic web representation/model/serialization > of provenance' A bit long! Can be shortened to "PROV-SW" to somewhat match "PROV-DM". "PROV Ontology" is my suggestion - or PROV-O for short. (provocation..?) (Serialisation recommendations like "At least provide RDF/XML, always explicitly assert any PROV class/property" might fight better in PAQ) -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 12:26:47 UTC