- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:21:02 +0100
- To: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:49, Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk> wrote: > we have just closed issue 94 pending review, however the idea of extending > complementOf to operate on PEs is potentially a reasonable one. > We propose that a separate issue be opened so that a focused discussion can > take place. Stian if you stand by this, would you do it? I've changed my mind about wasComplementOf on PEs, but having a way to express sub-processes (a PE consisted of several smaller PEs) might be an important issue, which I will raise. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Monday, 26 September 2011 13:21:58 UTC