Tuesday, 31 May 2016
- [web-annotation] Model Typos
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- [web-annotation] Normative refs ; change log
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where?
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where?
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Rob thursday
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of character position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Change 'reviewing' to 'assessing'?
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] 'Role' still present in examples
- Closed: [web-annotation] 'Role' still present in examples
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Change 'reviewing' to 'assessing'?
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Change 'reviewing' to 'assessing'?
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Change 'reviewing' to 'assessing'?
- [web-annotation] 'Role' still present in examples
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- [web-annotation] Change 'reviewing' to 'assessing'?
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
Monday, 30 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of character position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
Sunday, 29 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
Saturday, 28 May 2016
Friday, 27 May 2016
- Closed: [web-annotation] misspellungs
- Re: [web-annotation] misspellungs
- Re: [web-annotation] Minor issues with the individuals' formatting in the vocab spec
- Meeting minutes, 2016-05-27
- Re: [web-annotation] Status code requirements should be in the sections of Protocol
- Closed: [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- Re: [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- Closed: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
- Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
- Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
- Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
- Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
- Re: [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI
- Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
- Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
- Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
- [web-annotation] Minor issues with the individuals' formatting in the vocab spec
- Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
- Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
- Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
- Re: [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI
- New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
Thursday, 26 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of character position for text position selector
- Re: On Proxying, Annotations, and Security
- Re: [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI
- Re: [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Add diagrams to Vocab examples
- Re: [web-annotation] Rob Editor Actions
- Re: [web-annotation] `account` likely to conflict with foaf:account
- On Proxying, Annotations, and Security
- [web-annotation] protocol testing requirements
Wednesday, 25 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] Rob Editor Actions
- Friday's Agenda for the Web Annotation Working Group - 27 May at 11 AM Eastern (US)
- Re: Involving page owners in annotation
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: Involving page owners in annotation
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Closed: [web-annotation] Keeping the OA ontology up to date
Tuesday, 24 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] Create reference set of correct/incorrect annotations for test development
- Re: [web-annotation] Next/Prev are untestable
- Re: [web-annotation] Create reference set of correct/incorrect annotations for test development
- Involving page owners in annotation
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI
Monday, 23 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] white space normalisation
- Re: [web-annotation] white space normalisation
- Re: [web-annotation] Vocab namespaces section
- Re: [web-annotation] white space normalisation
- Re: [web-annotation] white space normalisation
- Re: [web-annotation] white space normalisation
- Re: [web-annotation] Request header and language negotiation
- Re: [web-annotation] white space normalisation
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI
- Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
- [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] Request header and language negotiation
- Re: [web-annotation] Request header and language negotiation
- Re: [web-annotation] white space normalisation
- Minutes of the two F2F days in Berlin
Sunday, 22 May 2016
- Re: WA vs. OA
- Re: [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- Closed: [web-annotation] ActivityStreams / Annotation comparison
- Closed: [web-annotation] (model) update reference for language tags: BCP47 instead of RFC5646
- Re: [web-annotation] ActivityStreams / Annotation comparison
- Re: [web-annotation] Fixes for #208 and #102
- Re: [web-annotation] Deref of namespace should go to vocab?
- Re: [web-annotation] Rob actions
- Closed: [web-annotation] value or text on the definition of an SVG selector
Saturday, 21 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- [web-annotation] Remove "and so forth", clarify utf-8 encoding
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- Re: [web-annotation] Request header and language negotiation
- Re: [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- Re: [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- Re: [web-annotation] Request header and language negotiation
Friday, 20 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] Request header and language negotiation
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: WA vs. OA
- Re: [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- Unacceptable use of our mailing lists (was Re: RR 2016 Final call for papers - abstract submission: 23 May)
- RR 2016 Final call for papers - abstract submission: 23 May
- Rights on the annotation and annotation body
- Re: Rights on the annotation and annotation body
- Rights on the annotation and annotation body
- Re: [web-annotation] String body must not have a language associated?
- Re: [web-annotation] String body must not have a language associated?
- Re: WA vs. OA
- Re: WA vs. OA
- No Teleconference this week (May 20)
- Re: WA vs. OA
- Re: WA vs. OA
- RE: WA vs. OA
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: WA vs. OA
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: WA vs. OA
- Closed: [web-annotation] Selector/media table
- Re: [web-annotation] Selector/media table
- WA vs. OA
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Added media types' table to the draft
- Re: [web-annotation] Added media types' table to the draft
- Re: [web-annotation] Added media types' table to the draft
- Re: [web-annotation] Added media types' table to the draft
- Re: [web-annotation] Added media types' table to the draft
Thursday, 19 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] Explain extending spec with new classes, esp Selectors
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Fwd: Transition Request: CR for Webmention
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Use of dc:language
- [web-annotation] Explain extending spec with new classes, esp Selectors
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Implementations wiki page
- Re: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' should use UTC by default
Wednesday, 18 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] Selector/media table
- Re: [web-annotation] Selector/media table
- [web-annotation] Next/Prev are untestable
- Re: [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- [web-annotation] Add a recommendation for HTTPS into the protocol spec
- Closed: [web-annotation] Privacy Interest Group (PING) review
- Re: [web-annotation] Privacy Interest Group (PING) review
- Re: [web-annotation] Should oa:start / oa:end be xsd:nonNegativeInteger or xsd:integer ?
- Re: [web-annotation] Should oa:start / oa:end be xsd:nonNegativeInteger or xsd:integer ?
- Re: [web-annotation] Add accessibility to the model & vocab
- Re: [web-annotation] Add diagrams to Vocab examples
- [web-annotation] Add accessibility to the model & vocab
- Re: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' should use UTC by default
- [web-annotation] Change NS to https://.../wa/
- Re: [web-annotation] HTML Serialization Use Cases
- Re: [web-annotation] HTML Serialization Use Cases
- Re: [web-annotation] Load ReSpec over HTTPS
- [web-annotation] Status code requirements should be in the sections of Protocol
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Closed: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Closed: [web-annotation] (model) make definition of a character more precise
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) make definition of a character more precise
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) make definition of a character more precise
- Re: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' should use UTC by default
- Closed: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' date/time properties specific reference and format
- Re: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' date/time properties specific reference and format
- Re: [web-annotation] white space normalisation
- Re: [web-annotation] Normalisation of Text Quote Selector
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- [web-annotation] Add pointer to TextualBody to textValue
- Re: [web-annotation] Defaults for an Annotation Collection
- Re: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' date/time properties specific reference and format
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
Tuesday, 17 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
- Closed: [web-annotation] Defaults for an Annotation Collection
- Re: [web-annotation] Defaults for an Annotation Collection
- Closed: [web-annotation] String body must not have a language associated?
- Re: [web-annotation] String body must not have a language associated?
- Closed: [web-annotation] How is language assigned to an annotation?
- Re: [web-annotation] How is language assigned to an annotation?
- Re: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' should use UTC by default
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' should use UTC by default
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) have a note on logical and visual order of text for text quote selector implementations
- Closed: [web-annotation] (model) missing mechanism to express language preferences in the intendend audience field
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) missing mechanism to express language preferences in the intendend audience field
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) update reference for language tags: BCP47 instead of RFC5646
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Closed: [web-annotation] Dis/Allow both hasState and hasSelector on same SpecificResource?
- Re: [web-annotation] Dis/Allow both hasState and hasSelector on same SpecificResource?
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] TimeState, generated, and modified should recommend all values use UTC
- Re: [web-annotation] misspellungs
- [web-annotation] String body must not have a language associated?
- [web-annotation] Normalisation of Text Quote Selector
- Re: [web-annotation] Deref of namespace should go to vocab?
- [web-annotation] white space normalisation
- [web-annotation] Request header and language negotiation
- [web-annotation] Defaults for an Annotation Collection
- [web-annotation] How is language assigned to an annotation?
- Re: [web-annotation] Deref of namespace should go to vocab?
- [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' date/time properties specific reference and format
- [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' should use UTC by default
- Re: [web-annotation] Deref of namespace should go to vocab?
- [web-annotation] TimeState, generated, and modified should recommend all values use UTC
- Re: [web-annotation] ActivityStreams / Annotation comparison
- Re: EME & User Agents
Monday, 16 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- EME & User Agents
- [web-annotation] Data type, cardinality questions, typos
Friday, 13 May 2016
Thursday, 12 May 2016
Monday, 9 May 2016
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- Re: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
- [web-annotation] misspellungs
- [web-annotation] (model) missing mechanism to express language preferences in the intendend audience field
- [web-annotation] (model) have a note on logical and visual order of text for text quote selector implementations
- [web-annotation] (model) make definition of a character more precise
- [web-annotation] (model) update reference for language tags: BCP47 instead of RFC5646
- RE: WA and JSON-LD default context
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
Sunday, 8 May 2016
Saturday, 7 May 2016
- RE: DOI and other identifiers
- RE: DOI and other identifiers
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
- RE: DOI and other identifiers
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
- RE: DOI and other identifiers
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
- Re: DOI and other identifiers
Friday, 6 May 2016
- Aligning Data Model requirements with JSON Schema, over-constrained / under-constrained
- DOI and other identifiers
- Re: WA and JSON-LD default context
- Re: WA and JSON-LD default context
- Minutes of meeting 2015-05-06
- Re: [web-annotation] value or text on the definition of an SVG selector
- Re: [web-annotation] value or text on the definition of an SVG selector
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: WA and JSON-LD default context
- Re: Web Annotation WG Agenda for Friday 6 May at 11 AM Eastern (US)
- Re: WA and JSON-LD default context
- WA and JSON-LD default context
- Europeana's Annotation API is now public
- Re: Web Annotation WG Agenda for Friday 6 May at 11 AM Eastern (US)
Thursday, 5 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
Wednesday, 4 May 2016
- Re: Web Annotation WG Agenda for Friday 6 May at 11 AM Eastern (US)
- Web Annotation WG Agenda for Friday 6 May at 11 AM Eastern (US)
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Selector/media table
- Re: [web-annotation] Selector/media table
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: [web-annotation] Selector/media table
- Re: [web-annotation] Selector/media table
Tuesday, 3 May 2016
- Re: [web-annotation] Selector/media table
- Re: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of charactor position for text position selector
- Re: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
- Re: Annotations with RDF statements