- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 09:37:28 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Hm. There is a bit of a mess indeed. As far as I can see (and looking at targets only) we have 1. the possibility to define multiple targets, which means "each Body is considered to be equally related to each Target individually, rather than to the set of all of the Targets." 2. the possibility to define a Choice, which "A Choice has an ordered list of resources from which an application should select only one to process or display. The order is given from the most preferable to least preferable, according to the Annotation's creator or publisher. " (which is a suitable terminology for a body, but should be different for a target; I believe this is, essentially, the OR feature of @jjett ) 3. @tcole3 refers to "AnnotationCollection", but I am not sure that is relevant; that is a collection of full blown annotations, and not related to targets and bodies Ie, we need, again to use @jjett's terminology, an AND. Can we do it similarly to "Choice", calling it "Combination" or something similar? That would also cover @paolociccarese's use case. We can add this to the model easily... (However, this is _irrelevant_ to the multiple selector issue! Can we really move this thread to a separate issue, unless we get to a quick solution?) -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/207#issuecomment-217113057 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2016 09:39:23 UTC