Re: [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI

Oh - I understand and agree that processing should be done using IRIs.
  I was just reacting to the name in the ontology.  Regardless.... if 
we are standardizing on IRI, and I think we should be, there is some 
nice language in RDFa Core that we could roll in:

> RDFa is a way of expressing RDF-style relationships using simple 
attributes in existing markup languages such as HTML. RDF is fully 
internationalized, and permits the use of Internationalized Resource 
Identifiers, or IRIs. You will see the term 'IRI' used throughout this
 specification. Even if you are not familiar with the term IRI, you 
probably have seen the term 'URI' or 'URL'. IRIs are an extension of 
URIs that permits the use of characters outside those of plain ASCII. 
RDF allows the use of these characters, and so does RDFa. This 
specification has been careful to use the correct term, IRI, to make 
it clear that this is the case.

GitHub Notification of comment by halindrome
Please view or discuss this issue at
 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 26 May 2016 16:44:52 UTC