- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 07:20:01 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Well ... indeed the motivations and the actions are semantically two different things, however, the motivation represents the "driver" to perform an action, and actually ... the annotation is the result of performing this action. Probably it is not really possible for now to reuse the schema.org in the annotations, but it would be wise to organize the motivations as hierarchical structure following the structure of the schema.org (if possible) and aligning the definitions of the Motivations with the ones of the actions. If we do so, we could also reference the schema.org in some non-normative Note. Something that is missing in the current Motivation list are the different flavors of Feedback/Review including (like, dislike, agree, disagree, endorse, and even win if you think of stakeOverflow which needs to mark the winning solution to a given Problem ). All these are available as subclasses of ReactAction (see the bottom of the page http://schema.org/ReactAction ) -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/248#issuecomment-222610791 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 07:20:04 UTC