- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 08:34:12 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@aphillips, first of all, thank you. Personally (not being an expert) I am fine with your suggested steps to replace what is in the current ED. Just some comments: 1. in entry no. 2 above, the final text should add a qualifier of 'if applicable'. The selector can be used for pure text or even PDF files, where that entry is irrelevant. 2. isn't it correct that the ``dir`` attribute is really relevant on the _rendering_ of the text? If so, I do not see any issue simply remove it; after all, the end of the algorithm produces texts that are used for textual comparisons... 3. I do not have any experience of the implementation of these steps, ie, whether it is difficult or easy in various environments. This is, after all, and issue for the CR phase. I think that it is worth, when going to CR, to 1. call out to this explicitly and ask implementers to provide us the necessary feedback 2. maybe (but only maybe) identify whether some of these steps may be identified as "at risk" in advance (or the whole thing?) The procedural importance of 3.ii above is that if implementers run into major issues and we will be forced to revoke some of these steps, we can do that at the end of the CR period without being forced to re-issue a CR again. -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/227#issuecomment-222349184 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 29 May 2016 08:34:14 UTC